By Arden Dale for DOW JONES NEWSWIRES, September 25, 2009
An Internal Revenue Service memo targeting loans that some offshore hedge funds make to U.S. businesses and others is causing deep concern among the funds and their investors.
It raises the chances that the IRS could decide to tax income from some of these loans, which could deeply pare funds' profits in those cases, up to 60% or 70%. While the income has always been taxable, funds in some cases have acted as though it isn't, and not paid taxes.
Roger Lorence, a partner in the tax group at law firm Sadis & Goldberg LLP in New York, calls the memo "one of the most important tax developments we've had in the hedge fund world in many years."
The memo from IRS Associate Chief Counsel, International Steven A. Musher doesn't affect all hedge funds, many of which invest in securities but don't loan money.
Dated Tuesday, it directs Kathy Robbins, IRS director of Field Operations, Manhattan, Financial Services, to look into cases involving offshore funds that may have used certain strategies "to originate loans in the United States giving rise to effectively connected income."
"We encourage you to develop these cases, and we stand ready to assist you in the legal analysis," Musher wrote.
The IRS isn't declaring any new rule of law, but "simply applying well-settled rules to a particular fact pattern," says Lorence.
John Schrier, a New York-based asset management and tax lawyer, says the development is capturing the attention of foreign and tax-exempt hedge fund investors such as charities, pension plans and private foundations that invest in offshore funds managed by U.S. fund managers.
These investors, he adds, "may be wondering if they want their money in a fund at risk to IRS litigation."
Over the past 10 years, U.S. funds have increasingly moved beyond traditional trading practices to become involved with loans and other financing, Schrier says. These managers often maintain offshore funds for foreign and tax-exempt investors that run parallel to their U.S. funds. They "bend over backwards trying to find structures that won't subject the offshore investors and the funds through which they invest to U.S. taxes," he adds.
The IRS memo notes one such strategy, and concludes that it doesn't work.
Law firm Sadis & Goldberg is among numerous law and accounting firms sending out analyses to clients on the development. In a tax alert published Thursday, it explains that when an offshore fund acquires debt obligations of U.S. borrowers in the secondary market, U.S. taxes are generally limited to a 30% U.S. withholding tax on the amount of any contingent interest.
An offshore fund that originates loans in the U.S., however, may be treated as a finance company engaged in the conduct of a U.S. trade or business. In that case, it is subject to regular corporate income tax on its net income from carrying on its U.S. business, as well as secondary tax known as branch profits tax, and state and local income taxes.
The result, notes Sadis & Goldberg, is an effective income tax rate of 60% to 70% on the income in question.
The IRS didn't immediately comment.

